Google is the dominant search engine. It is a major source of traffic for most businesses. Thus, it is critical for anyone pursuing business seriously to rank well on Google.
While no one knows what all the factors are that go in determining Google ranking, but it is well known fact that page speed is one of the primary ones. Page speed not only affects load time but it meddles with user experience, something Google gives a lot of weight to, and has even mentioned it.
For a user, there’s absolutely nothing as annoying as a slow website. They’re an impatient bunch, with a very short attention span. And they don’t have the time or tolerance for a website that doesn’t respect that. And Google knows it.
And if that wasn’t enough, as per Google, there’s a direct relation between conversion rates and page load time.
What is Google PageSpeed Insight?
It is a free-to-use tool by Google that gives you a lot of insight and performance suggestions for improving the page load time. PageSpeed Insights analyzes the content of a web page, and then generates suggestions to make that page faster. This is done taking into account a lot of different reports along with analysis done using Google Lighthouse, details of which can be found here.
Does this PageSpeed also give reports for images?
Google Pagespeed generates a report for the entire page. And since images are a part of the page, those get included in the report as well. And now, with the use of Lighthouse, it gives some stellar suggestions for improving the image-related assets on your website.
But why images?
Most often, images are the lowest hanging fruit in your goal towards overall page performance improvement. Image optimization is now available as a standard from a lot of tools like ImageKit. And you can solve these problems, that too, without any extensive changes from your end in your code. So, it’s usually the first and easiest thing to provide a solution for.
What are the issues with images reported by Google?
As of the date this article was published, Google PageSpeed Insights reports 5 issues with images on the website. Let’s have a look at them and how you can solve for each using different techniques.
Serve images in next-gen formats
WebP, JPEG2000, and JPEG XR are modern image formats supported in the browser providing better compression and visual quality as compared to the older JPG and PNG formats. Higher compression while maintaining the visual quality means your images consume lesser data over the network and are downloaded faster.
Point to note:
Amongst these three formats, WebP is the one that has seen the maximum adoption. With Firefox also adopting it, it is now supported in over 80% devices. However, both JPEG2000 and JPEG XR have not really caught up with browser support at 13% and 4% respectively. JPEG2000 is supported in Safari, whereas JPEG XR is supported in IE browsers. With such low adoption numbers, you can skip doing these entirely to save some effort. Google’s PageSpeed tool also does not report cases where JPEG2000 and JPEGXR are not used.
How to do it?
You can use ImageKit to automatically deliver the images in the right format. It supports conversion to WebP, but does not support JPEG2000 or JPEGXR.
Additionally, ImageKit also takes into account other factors like image content type, compression level, etc., to deliver the best format that returns the smallest possible image size (which, in quite a few cases involving lossy PNG compression, may not be WebP).
Properly size images
Once the image has been converted to the right format it is also important to bring it down to the right dimensions, ones actually needed on the page.
An image clicked using a DSLR camera could be more than 5000×3000 pixels, which is not what you need on your website. You probably need this image on three different pages on your website, each with a different size requirement – product detail page (something around size 1000x1000px), a product listing page (size 400x400px), and website home page (a thumbnail of size 100x100px). So, you must resize and crop your original image which measured about 5000x3000px to these three sizes.
If you have a responsive website, and are wondering how to load the correct size of an image across different devices, then you should consider implementing the srcset and sizes attributes of the img tag instead of the plain src tag. These new, advanced attributes allow you to provide the browser with a list of image URLs and the specifications for using them. The browser then automatically loads the correct image URL from the available list for every device. Have a look here for more details on this.Inefficient resizing is often the biggest contributor to image weight on a web page. Click To Tweet
How to do it?
It is best to use a real-time image resizing solution like ImageKit for this which allows you to resize and crop your image to any dimension just by specifying it in the URL. This has two advantages –
- You do not have to do this resizing manually or write any code of your own to do it.
- A real-time solution allows you to quickly adapt your images to changes in layouts.
It is common for a website design to change, or for a new device to come in and require a different image dimension. Having a real-time image resizing solution ensures that you easily adapt to such a situation by just changing the dimensions specified in the URL.
Efficiently encode images
After converting the image to the right format and dimension, you need to compress the image to bring it down to the right size as well. That is, you need to compress an image without degrading its perceived visual quality.
Typically, compression levels are defined on a scale of 1-100 with 100 being the best quality (or lowest compression). Lighthouse, which is used in Google PageSpeed, tests the image against a compression level of 85.
It is usually safe to deliver your images at a quality level between 75-90. At these levels, the tradeoff between image size and image quality is acceptable and the visual degradation would be imperceptible to the human eye. Adjusting the compression level can bring down the image size significantly, therefore, allowing for faster downloads.
How to do it?
ImageKit provides real-time compression directly from the URL.
You can set the desired quality parameter in the URL to get the image at that compression level, or you can set the default quality level for every image directly from your dashboard.
Defer offscreen images
It is common these days to have long webpages stretching over multiple scrolls. A typical e-commerce product listing page has hundreds of products on the same page, each with an image or two of its own. This means a page could load somewhere between 100-200 images, which roughly translates to over 1MB of images on the page.
Though, when a user first loads the page, he is not able to see the entire page. He is just looking at the first fold of the website that fits on his screen. This would mean just the first 10-20 products or banners are visible to the user when the page first loads. Therefore, the remaining 80-100 images need not be loaded until the user starts scrolling down the page.
This reduces the amount of images needed to be downloaded at the very beginning, freeing up the device’s resources (network and computational capacity) to process other webpage assets like JS, CSS, etc., in turn making the page load faster.
How to do it?
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy
The fastest way to load a website is to not load it at all. That is, we must try to avoid requests that go over the network resulting in a fresh download of a resource.
Images do not change for long periods of time. A black Adidas shoe will look the same for all users for months to come. This makes it a strong candidate for storing it locally in the user’s browser cache for a long period of time, and then re-using that local cached copy instead of downloading the image again and again over the network.
You can set the cache time of any resource with the Cache-Control header. You can read more about it here.
Images should be cached for a long period of time (usually a year or more). Though, after having tried and tested with different cache times, PageSpeed insight looks for a cache time of at least 180 days for this particular warning. This warning would come up for resources with cache-time less than 180 days.
ImageKit takes care of this automatically, and all the images are always served with the right cache-control headers with a 180-day expiry time.
While you are spending hours and days building the perfect website for your business, don’t forget the images you display on it have a direct impact on your user experience and page load speed.
Optimizing your images and providing the best user experience will give your website the edge it needs above the competition.