Embedded Images
Glossary
What are Embedded Images?
Embedded images are graphics or pictures directly incorporated into a web page, email, or application – as part of its source code itself.
Rather being referenced as external files stored on external servers, embedded images are integrated inline using Base64 encoding, which converts image binary data into a text string that can be directly placed within HTML, CSS, or other document types, wherever you need an image.
A Base64 encoded image has this format:
data:[<mimetype>];base64,<encoded string>
You'd use it in place of src in HTML like this:
<img src="..." alt= "Example Image"/>
Or in CSS, for properties like background-image:
.some-element {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-image: url(...);
background-size: cover;
}
And it'll show up on the page as a regular image, indistinguishable from one loaded via an external URL or file reference as the src, until you examine the source.
Since the image is loaded as part of the initial HTML (or similar, for apps), users don't experience a delay caused by external image requests. This makes the approach ideal for small, static graphics like icons, logos, email signatures, and simple UI elements where immediate loading and offline availability are priorities.
What are some ideal uses for Embedded Images?
In general, embedded images are ideal in scenarios where self-contained, reliable visuals are needed without relying on external resources. Here are some common use cases:
- Web Design: Commonly used for static icons, charts, graphs, and branding elements like logos (which are typically small in size and don't change often) to make them part of the initial HTML or CSS payload, eliminating separate HTTP requests, and making them unaffected by external server outages, path errors, or external blocking.
- Emails: Embedded images may be used to bypass email clients that block externally hosted images for privacy or security, ensuring critical visuals (like logos or banners) display consistently without requiring any extra work on either the developer or the user's part.
- High-Availability or Offline Applications: They're ideal for use in apps or educational resources that are distributed locally or with minimal setup, or designed to run offline, without an internet connection at all.
In short - embedded images are a good idea anytime you need to serve assets that are small in size, critical for design consistency, static and not frequently updated, and which need high availability.
Advantages of Embedded Images
Embedded images offer a range of benefits that enhance content reliability and user experience.
- Faster Loading: Embedding eliminates the need for additional HTTP requests to fetch the image, reducing latency. Small assets like icons or logos load immediately when the HTML or CSS file itself is fetched.
- High Availability: Since the images are part of the content itself, users can access them without requiring an internet connection. Perfect for emails, reports, or static HTML files where the content needs to remain intact during sharing.
- Consistent Display: Because embedded images are not subject to external hosting variables, they ensure consistency - no more broken links or blocked external images, ensuring that design is consistent, and always appears as intended.
- Bypassing Image Blocks: In email contexts, embedded images bypass restrictions set by email clients that block linked images for security reasons. This ensures that important visuals are displayed by default, enhancing the user's immediate engagement with the content.
- Privacy and Security: For the consumer, embedding ensures no external server sees user activity (e.g., when they download the image), which means they're ideal for high-privacy apps. On the webmaster's side, they can prevent "hotlinking" or unauthorized reuse of your intellectual property by anyone else - as there is no traditionally stored image file to download or link to.
Disadvantages of Embedded Images
While embedded images offer significant benefits, they come with certain limitations that must be carefully managed.
- Increased File Size: Base64 encodes binary data into an ASCII string. Each group of 3 bytes (24 bits) in the original data is converted into 4 Base64 characters (each 6 bits). This results in a size increase of approximately 33% because the ASCII string representation requires more bytes to store the same information.
- No caching: Linked images can be cached by browsers or email clients, making them faster to load on subsequent visits. Embedded images don't benefit from caching, as they are always part of the document. The issue becomes worse if you are reusing embedded images across multiple pages or emails.
- Difficult to update: Updating an embedded image means re-encoding and replacing the entire Base64 string within the document. This is cumbersome compared to simply updating an image file on a server, as the reference remains unchanged.
- Messy source code: Having images embedded directly in the HTML or email code also makes the source file harder to read and manage. Debugging or editing the code becomes more difficult, especially with large images.
- Slower on legacy devices: Embedded images must be decoded by the browser/email client before they can be shown, and this can be an issue on slower devices or browsers, leading to slower page rendering.
- Can be flagged as spam: Very large documents with Base64-encoded images can trigger spam filters. The increased size and the use of embedded content might raise red flags with some servers, causing the email or document to be marked as spam or even rejected. Basically, don't use embedded images for large and/or frequently updated images, or when reusability and caching are important (e.g. for site-wide graphics)
Embedded Images vs. Linked Images vs. Attached Images
Understanding the differences between embedded, linked, and attached images is key to choosing the right approach:
Aspect | Embedded Images | Linked Images | Attached Images |
---|---|---|---|
How is it stored? | Part of the email or document itself, incorporated into its source code via Base64 encoding. | Hosted on an external server, and only referenced via URL. | Sent as separate files with the email. |
File Size Impact | Increases the size of the email/document. Base64 encodes binary data into an ASCII string, increasing size. | No impact on email/document size. The file is stored somewhere else. | Increases email size with file attachments. The more images you attach, the larger the email size. |
Availability | Displays offline as it is embedded in the source code. | Does not display if the external server is unavailable, file is missing, or there is no network connection. | Can be displayed offline after initial load, only if the email is downloaded. |
Use Cases | Ideal for small assets that don’t change often, and are critical to display consistently – logos, small icons, charts, etc. | Any kind of image hosted on websites or dynamic content. | Sharing high-quality images relevant to the email, or additional resources. |
Privacy | Entirely private as no external server is involved and safe from hotlinking. | External server involved by design; may expose users to tracking via image links. | Generally secure but may trigger antivirus scans (dependent on email client). |
Each method serves specific purposes, with embedded images ideal for ensuring critical visuals are consistently displayed across devices.
How can I optimize Embedded Images?
To mitigate performance issues, optimizing embedded images is crucial:
- Optimize your images: Use tools to reduce the file size of images before encoding them using Base64. Formats like WebP can provide high compression without noticeable quality loss. Smaller images take up less space, reducing the size of the Base64 string and improving load times.
- Compress your HTML: Apply gzip compression to your HTML or email content (which includes Base64-encoded images). Compressing the entire HTML document will reduce the size of the Base64 string, too, making it more manageable to send or load.
- Selective Embedding: Only embed small images that are crucial to the content, like icons, logos, and small illustrations. Large photos or high-resolution images, or assets that are frequently updated, should still be linked or attached instead of embedded.
By applying these strategies, you can optimize the performance of embedded images, balancing visual quality with load time efficiency, and keeping file sizes manageable.
Conclusion
Embedded images offer a convenient solution for ensuring self-contained, offline-accessible, and consistent visuals across emails and web pages. Their consistency and privacy benefits make them ideal for web design and email marketing.
However, the choice between embedding, linking, or attaching images depends on the project's requirements. Embedding works best for critical visuals, while linking and attaching may suit scenarios prioritizing file size or flexibility.
Of course, in modern web development, optimization and delivery solutions like ImageKit's Image API are increasingly preferred. With the improvements in delivery, and the real-time transformation capabilities it brings to the table, embedding images has become less common. Today, embedding is typically reserved for small assets like icons, while linking these CDN-delivered images is the go-to approach for optimizing performance and scalability.